Exterior

Wheelbase 104.30 in.
Overall Length 182.50 in.
Overall Height 65.20 in.
Track Front 61.90 in.
Track Rear 62.60 in.
Ground Clearance 6.30 in.
Curb Weight-automatic 3933 lbs

Interior

Standard Seating 5
Front Headroom 38.70 in.
Front Legroom 41.80 in.
Front Shoulder Room 58.20 in.
Front Hip Room 54.40 in.
Rear Legroom 37.70 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 56.30 in.
Rear Hip Room 53.00 in.
Cargo Volume 27.80 cu.ft.
Passenger Volume 101.40 cu.ft.

Transmission

Transmission-short 5A
Transmission-long 5-Speed Automatic

Suspension

Front Spring Type Coil
Front Suspension Ind
Rear Spring Type Coil
Rear Suspension Ind

Wheels

Alloy Wheels Std.
Wheelbase 104.30 in.

Tires

Tires 235/55R18
Turning Diameter 39.20 in.
Number Reviews 38
Average raiting 4.5
David Collantes
2015-08-10 13:23

Very unreliable car, poorly manufactured. "Leather interior" is not quite leather, instrumentation will not give you details on battery not charging, or similar issues until it fully dead. Ride is not comfortable, "eats" gas like a monster. Overall craft of the car is poor. Will never buy an Acura again, unless it comes straight from Japan.

Average raiting - 2
comfort: 2    interior: 2    performance: 2    reliability: 2    safety: 3    technology: 3    value: 2   
sad_owner1
2014-01-29 13:23

The 2010 RDX drives like a dream. Handles very well especially in the snow. I loved this car until I've had to make the following warranty replaced repairs... 4 new batteries, Replaced auto start, Replaced Air compressor relay switch, Alternator, Windshield wiper switch and still have issues with windshield wipers. This sadly, will be my last Acura

Average raiting - 3.3
comfort: 5    interior: 4    performance: 3    reliability: 1    safety:     technology:     value:    
ezma
2013-09-26 17:14

I hoped the turbo is fun to drive. In order to get a car like this, performance is a must, but it doesn't. Use premium gas plus high priced in maintenance, this car is failed to qualify as a luxury SUV. The NAV is the worse one on market. I don't even want to use it because the lack of touch screen. To operate the NAV feel so dump. Turbo kick in is similar to the down shift gear. Bit just too slow. I would say even RAV4 V6 is way better than this junk. So this is a way overpriced with really bad performed SUV. 2010 to 2012 are the same. 2013 and later changed to V6 but no more SH-AWD. I don't see what's the position of this SUV.

Average raiting - 2.5
comfort: 2    interior: 3    performance: 3    reliability: 3    safety:     technology:     value:    
klrsmile
2012-01-16 22:27

Having test driven a variety of its competitors, including some SUVs up-market as well as down (GLK, X3, Q5, Highlander) as well as being a former MDX owner, my wife and I were equally impressed with the RDX, albeit for very different reasons. He: Love the performance, 0-60 in about 6 seconds - very impressive, and surprisingly nimble, a very fun car to drive. The stereo is equally impressive, sounds great and free 12 months subscription to satellite insures something for everyone to listen to. She: The cargo space handles weekend shopping and family upkeep with ease. Crash test ratings help keep the kids safe

Average raiting - 4.8
comfort: 4    interior: 5    performance: 5    reliability: 5    safety:     technology:     value:    
dahaad3925
2011-06-04 19:28

The RDX was really convenient for the extra cargo space, but it lacked two things that really bugged me. 1.) storage space in the cabin. There was absolutely no where to put anything out of sight in the cargo compartment. I wish they had put more little cubbies to store stuff in. 2.) The cabin noise when you drive down the street. I could hear everything and it drove me nuts! I am a luxury car owner. Before the RDX I owned a BMW, and in comparison I wanted my BMW back everyday. Overall, I don't think the RDX was worth the almost 40K I paid for it brand new. I'm not going to lie, the surround sound and technology was nice, but it's practicality is why it gets a partial substandard review.

Average raiting - 3.4
comfort: 4    interior: 3    performance: 3    reliability: 3    safety:     technology:     value:    
NHTSA Recall Number:  16V061000
Recall Date:  03 February 2016

SUMMARY
Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) is recalling certain model year 2007-2011 Honda CR-V, 2011-2015 CR-Z, 2010-2014 FCX, and Insight, 2009-2013 Fit, 2013-2014 Fit EV, 2007-2014 Ridgeline, 2013-2016 Acura ILX, 2013-2014 Acura ILX Hybrid, 2007-2016 RDX, 2005-2012 Acura RL, 2009-2014 Acura TL, and 2010-2013 Acura ZDX vehicles. The affected vehicles are equipped with a dual-stage driver frontal air bag that may be susceptible to moisture intrusion which, over time, could cause the inflator to rupture.

CONSEQUENCE
In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

REMEDY
In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.

MANUFACTURER NOTES
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.

Cost

Below market Market average Above market
$10,699 $12,481 $14,263

IIHS

Side impact test Good
Rear crash protection/head restraint Good
IIHS Moderate Overlap Front Test Results Good